Posted by jerry on February 4th, 2005 — Posted in Journal
Sharon’s post on Rick Rack Ruby and the tie skirts reminded me of a similar spin-out I had when visiting Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum. What could connect the two? Well, my early childhood was spent in the UK near the town of Bodmin in Cornwall. My family was not well off, and it was a real treat to take the train to the seaside town of Padstow on the Bodmin-Wadebridge line. The train we took was an old steam train – driven by a saddle tank engine, which pulled an enclosed carriage the size of a one tonne van, and two open air trucks with bench seats. The latter was cheaper and most times that was how we travelled. That was back in the early 1960s when I was a toddler. Now fast forward 40 years and I visit the Powerhouse Museum. Great – they have steam locomotives – hmmm hang on, there’s a whole small train there with an enclosed carriage and a couple of open trucks with a saddle tank engine in front… Yup its the very same train that once took an excited kid to the beach in Cornwall!
cheers
Jerry
Comments Off on your past in a museum
Posted by jerry on February 2nd, 2005 — Posted in Journal, Writing
I was reading Fred On Something today, and he had a fascinating post on the complex problem of organising offline information contained in notebooks, like the wonderful Moleskine ones. Clearly some people had taken issue with the idea of linking ideas in an offline journal, resulting in a small clarification post. I think the concept is great – but then i’m too lazy to do anything that ambitious.
Leonardo da Vinci ran into the same issue – several times he attempted to organise the thousands of pages of his noteboks into some sort of publishable form, or at least in a form that would enable him to find information again, having once recorded it.
The problem of linking information and referencing it is practically as old as writing itself. The ancient Assyrians used referencing to keep track of clay tablets. The Library at Alexandria used tags on the ends of scrolls to reference the contents of information – Each group of tablets contained a brief citation to identify the contents and each room contained a tablet near the door to classify the general contents of each room. So the issue is not new.
It comes down to levels of personal organisation. how to link information across notebooks, or link later comments on earlier entries without having to re-write the whole entry. As I said I doubt I will ever be that organised, but I do use titles and dates in my Moleskines – that and the fact that I draw a lot of diagrams, means I can usually get to what I want by knowing either roughly when I wrote it, or by flicking through and looking for the drawings.
Anyhow thanks to Fred for a stimulating post 🙂
Cheers
Jerry
Comments Off on Moleskine notebooks as offline blogs
Posted by jerry on January 29th, 2005 — Posted in History, Journal, Travel
Claims that one of Leonardo da Vinci’s workshops may have been found at the Santissima Annunziata Monastery in Florence are certainly intriguing. The claims seem based on three things: firstly, that many artists lived and worked at the monastery at the time Leonardo was in Florence; secondly, there are frescoes on the wall in a style not unlike Leonardo’s, including what appear to sketches for Leonardo’s Angel Gabriel; and thirdly, a so-called ‘secret room’ off one corner of the main room would have offered a plausibly discrete area for Leonardo to conduct his anatomical research – an area he could close off from prying eyes.
Art historians hope that the collection of five rooms – likely a combined residence and workshop – in a building just off the Piazza of the Santissima Annunziatain in central Florence, may shed some more light on the life of the Renaissance artist. And even if it is not the studio of Leonardo, the rooms may at least shed some light on what is was like to live in Florence as an artist in the 16th century.
The Italian institute of military geography – now a part owner and occupier of the building – may also be partly responsible for the discovery. Think about it – if you put together a collection of bright young visually literate people in a room to study (a group of people taught to analyse and question every aspect of their surroundings) and there are a bunch of old faded frescoes on the wall, sooner or later someone would surely wonder about the origin of the frescoes – especially if there are striking resemblances to the style of of one of Florence’s most famous artists.
But why would they remain undiscovered for so long? Surely those at the monastery would have some idea or at least curiosity about the frescoes? My guess is that there were more prosaic factors at work. It was and I believe still is a working monastery. It is an old building, and the thing about old buildings is that over time their functions change, requiring modifications to the building – new walls, relocation of doors and so on. Now suppose you suspected that there might be something historically special about the frescoes – can you imagine how quickly an historical preservation order would be slapped on the place? Wham! suddenly you can’t just knock a new doorway in or build a partition wall unless it was in keeping with the sixteenth century structure. Suddenly you can’t just lease out a couple of rooms to a local teaching institution – the security risk would be too great – as would the insurance costs! Best to keep it a little-known rumour within a small religious community, and perhaps occasionally sneak in to admire the brush work 🙂
Who knows what the truth may be – perhaps it was an artist who had studied under a student of Leonardo or just someone who admired that style. For now there is no proof that it is one of Leonardo’s studios, but there is certainly an exciting forensic art history assignment for some lucky group of researchers!
cheers
Jerry
Comments Off on Leonardo’s workshop found in Florence
Posted by jerry on January 18th, 2005 — Posted in History, Journal
Today is the second anniversary of the Great Fire of Canberra – a time to reflect on how we have rebuilt and recovered from that event. By now those who weren’t there will have largely forgotten, perhaps occasionally recalling the colour of the sky that day, but otherwise forgetting that on that day Canberra became two groups of people.
After the smoke cleared, along with most of the garden, the house actually came off very lightly with only about $20,000 worth of damage – we were very lucky! The house was structurally sound and the wiring was okay. Considering the gas meter had melted off the wall we were quite amazed – it is a lucky house indeed 🙂
While the damage to the house was quite superficial, the garden was back to scorched earth. We tried digging the baked clay afterwards, but realised all we had was effectively a big ceramic pot for a garden. Several truckloads of new top soil later and months of buying plants and planting and digging (- and weeding! – with the forest gone, the weeds were quick to colonise the landscape, and the result is that weed seeds are a constant companion on the wind).
But as winter turns to Spring, and Spring to Summer for the second year we notice two things: firstly our garden was in shock for the first year and little flowered or flourished. Now as we conclude the second year, the garden is finally getting established and things are beginning to take off.
The big tree did not survive, and its timber is now milled and drying in my shed – it is my intention to build our dining table this year from that tree – I’ll blog the process when it happens.
The hedge is starting to look hedge-like now, instead of a row of shrubs
And the claret ash tree is growing strongly. The only trouble is that it looks like we may have to move it as we read recently that these things grow 20-30 metres tall – so it is probably a bit close to the power lines for that kind of size.
The second thing we have noticed is that, like the transition from winter to Spring, the suburb is sprouting houses from the bare blocks that were left in the wake of the devastation. And there is a very positive feel to the suburb as the place became a neighbourhood, rather than a collection of houses. We actually know the neighbours – for the first time in our lives. This sentiment is also being expressed at the level of the city as a new forward-looking plan has been proposed for a friendlier Canberra with lakeside coffee shops and family-friendly parks. Canberra is genuinely developing a heart.
In Weston Creek the sense of community is strong and as the new houses are nearing completion, and we see people all around rebuilding their lives – some of them from scratch – we are seeing a community emerge like a breath of fresh air. It is a wonderfully positive environment to be in.
Each year at this time we have a dinner to celebrate our good fortune and to reflect on what it means to survive a natural disaster – made all the more poignant this year with the Boxing Day Tsunnami in SE Asia and the bushfires in South Australia.
So here’s a glass to good fortune and another to absent friends
Cheers
Jerry
Comments Off on Canberra Bushfires – Two years on
Posted by jerry on January 4th, 2005 — Posted in History, Journal, Travel
Continuing my series of photos from the band’s tour to Beijing Nov/Dec 2004, I thought I’d post these…
On 4 December it dawned foggy in Beijing. We took the opportunity to visit the Ancient Observatory. It resides on part of the Beijing City Wall and is topped by several armillary spheres and azimuth instruments in bronze, built by the Jesuits in the 17th century.
A surreal sight in modern Beijing
The observatory dates back to Kublai Khan’s days when it was situated north of its present location. The Chinese have a long tradition of astrology and consequently have long been keen observers of the heavens.
Ancient carving depicting a comet
The present observatory was built in 1442 (the 7th year of the Zhengtong reign of the Ming dynasty) to facilitate both astrological purposes and seafaring navigation (the book 1421 discusses the remarkable accuracy of Chinese navigation of the period.)
Armillary sphere – 1439
The Jesuits were present in the capital from 1601 when Fr Matteo Ricci’s group was allowed to work with Chinese scientists. But the most remarkable of the Jesuits was a Flemish priest called Fr Ferdinand Verbiest (1623-1688) who arrived in Beijing in 1659 as a special advisor to the Qing court to assist in the delicate task of correcting the Chinese calendar.
Shortly after Verbiest arrived in Peking the Jesuits were accused of teaching a false religion and were imprisoned and tortured, pending execution. But in a dramatic reversal of fortune, an earthquake destroyed the part of the palace chosen for the execution, and seen as an omen, the sentence was not carried out and the Jesuits were released. The emperor Kang Hsi later ordered a public debate to ascertain the relative merits of Christian and Moslem astronomy. The debate involved three tests: to determine the shadow of a fixed gnomon, to predict the position of the planets at a fixed time and to predict the exact time of a lunar eclipse which had been expected about that time. The challenge was between the Chinese Moslem, Yang, and the Christian, Verbiest. The Heavens would be the judge. Verbiest had the superior astronomical data and won convincingly – securing him the immediate appointment as chair of the Board of Mathematics.
Of the eight bronze instruments on display six were designed and constructed under Verbiest’s supervision. They were built between 1669 and 1673.
Azimuth theodolite (1715) for measuring azimuth and altitude of celestial bodies
Sextant (1673) for measuring angular distance between stars and angular diameter of the sun and moon – one of Verbiest’s instruments.
Altazimuth (1673) for measuring azimuths of celestial bodies – Verbiest
Ecliptic Armilla (1673) – another of Verbiest’s instruments – for measuring ecliptic longitude differences and latitude of celestial bodies.
Each of the instruments are supported on fantastic bronze dragons and delicate traceries:
And here is a view of the observatory museum situated at the base of the observatory. Inside are bronze and brass navigation instruments, model clypsedra (water clocks) and some ancient pottery depicting celestial events.
The museum also houses the ancient seismograph for registering the occurrence and direction of earthquakes. It was invented in 132AD by Zheng Heng of the Bast Han dynasty.
All in all this was one of the best museums we visited in Beijing – a real gem and well worth a visit!
cheers
Jerry
Comments Off on China photos – The Ancient Observatory
